Grammaticality

1. They are both correct. However "can" entails the issue of "possibility". If you ask someone "can you" it is as if you're wondering if they are capable of doing it. "May" is typically used for requests, but I will definitely side with WindowsDude7 right above! "Could" is definitely your best shot if you want to express politeness :)

Oxford's dictionary entry states this meaning and usage as valid, though it warns that some people think it is incorrect:. Although this is the most common use of hopefully, it is a fairly new use and some people think it is not correct. It is worth noting that this usage has been accepted by oxford.grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited May 3, 2011 at 12:56. Uticensis. 21.7k 69 69 gold badges 150 150 silver badges 239 239 bronze badges. asked May 3, 2011 at 12:42. xzhu xzhu. 2,620 11 11 gold badges 33 33 silver badges 48 48 bronze badges. 5. 1.grammaticality. In LINGUISTICS, conformity to the rules of a language as formulated by a GRAMMAR based on a theory of language description. Source for information on …Yes, any kind of phrase can be used as a subject, given the right predicate and context. That makes it a prepositional phrase acting as a noun, because subjects are considered noun phrases. Ditto clauses, like That she left early was unfortunate; they're often called "noun clauses" because they can be subjects.Yes, you should use despite. The word despite is a preposition which takes a noun as its object, and doesn't require of. Despite of is incorrect, and sounds distinctly non-native. (You're probably getting confused by the similar phrase in spite of. In spite of means basically the same thing as despite .)Robusto, et al, should be correct but "only" is a rather unusual word, in that context and idiomatic misuse normally overrule all else. "in this time" and even the specific "do so much" blur the issue and generally, "I can only do…". should really be "I can do only…".grammaticality; pronouns; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jan 20, 2021 at 0:04. JEL. 32.6k 4 4 gold badges 66 66 silver badges 108 108 bronze badges. asked Jun 15, 2011 at 21:30. rest_day rest_day. 4,093 8 8 gold badges 32 32 silver badges 39 39 bronze badges. 5. 13.Abstract. Ever since Pereira (2000) provided evidence against Chomsky’s (1957) conjecture that statistical language modelling is incommensurable with the aims of grammaticality prediction as a research enterprise, a new area of research has emerged that regards statistical language models as “psycholinguistic subjects” and probes their ...

Grammaticality definition: (of a sentence) the state or quality of being well formed; correctness | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examplesThe evaluation of a sentence by a language user is called a grammaticality judgement. Grammaticality judgements as a tool for investigating the linguistic system of an individual language user—there is no way to get a grammaticality judgement for “English” as a whole, for example, only grammaticality judgements from individual English ... grammaticality; negation; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Apr 26, 2020 at 8:11. help-info.de. 2,537 1 1 gold badge 13 13 silver badges 22 22 bronze badges. asked Apr 26, 2020 at 2:58. Ashitaka Ashitaka. 63 1 1 silver badge 4 4 bronze badges. Add a comment |Jan 17, 2013 at 14:14. 1. But @BillFranke the OP is asking whether the second line can be used at all ("The people (of which there are many, many)"). My answer is no, it can't, but I couldn't tell you why. Good question. – JAM. Jan 17, 2013 at 14:51. 1. @JAM: Sure the second line can be used in colloquial English.grammaticality; phrases; word-usage; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited May 15, 2013 at 11:28. hattenn. asked May 15, 2013 at 10:27. hattenn hattenn. 235 1 1 gold badge 3 3 silver badges 9 9 bronze badges. 6. Let's assume you're speaking to the right person, not a receptionist. If you're going to ask for something on behalf of a client ...Sorted by: 34. Oxford lists three primary meanings for the word grow. The first two reflect what we often immediately think of when we think about growing: grow ( v.) to undergo natural development by increasing in size and changing physically. grow ( v.) to become larger or greater over a period of time; to increase.

I would agree with your judgement that *"They weren't that good reviews " and *"They weren't that good people" are both ungrammatical. This judgment seems to be consistent with Frank Van Eynde's description of "The Big Mess Construction":This construction, for which Berman (1974) coined the term Big Mess Construction, only ocurs …8. "See you Monday" is more colloquial. For instance, you would say to a friend "See you Monday!", but if you were making an appointment for something more formal it would be correct to say "See you on Monday". The word "on" is implied in the less formal statement. Share.grammaticality; grammar; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited May 17, 2013 at 18:34. terdon. 21.4k 18 18 gold badges 86 86 silver badges 125 125 bronze badges. asked May 17, 2013 at 18:08. Shaz Shaz. 225 1 1 gold badge 2 2 silver badges 8 8 bronze badges. Add a comment |Mistake #1: Using Prescriptive Language When Descriptive Language Is Needed. Prescriptive language is often used to give orders or instructions, while descriptive language is used to describe something objectively. One common mistake is using prescriptive language when descriptive language is needed.

Ku footnall.

grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jan 24, 2020 at 9:53. Infinity. asked Jan 24, 2020 at 8:33. Infinity Infinity. 656 1 1 gold badge 5 5 silver badges 12 12 bronze badges. 3. Ich glaube, die Überschrift stimmt nicht mit der dann ausformulierten Frage überein.Here are thefreedictionary's (relatively) distinct senses for the noun understanding.... 1: The quality or condition of one who understands; comprehension. 2: The faculty by which one understands; intelligence. 3: Individual or specified judgment or outlook; opinion. 4: A compact implicit between two or more people, or the matter implicit in such a compact.The reason for his actions lay in his past. or a preposition: The first horse past the post. or an adverb: Several dogs ran past. or an adjective: The past week has been a busy one. In your case your are talking about the years past where past is an adjective. That's to say, earlier years or years that have gone by.This paper examines the role of age, working memory span and phonological ability in the mastery of ten different grammatical constructions. Six- through eleven-year-old children (n=68) and adults (n=19) performed a grammaticality judgment task as well as tests of working memory capacity and recepti …Grammaticality is a measure of how difficult it is to find a context in which the sentence makes sense. IF you pronounce "As suggested" properly, indicating that it's a …Grammaticality definition: (of a sentence) the state or quality of being well formed; correctness | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples in American English

and proceeds to show me: Definite article + plural noun: Die Männer = The Men. Yes, that's referring to the Nominative (not the other cases) The second table is about the declination of the definite article / all cases of the plural, and the example: Ich will nicht nur mit den Männern arbeiten. is an example of Dative case.Grammaticality definition, the state or quality of being grammatical. See more.In direct and indirect questions, words such as who or when usually move to the front of the clause or sentence that they occur in. Why do I say move? Well, although it is less common, with direct questions you can leave them in the same place that they would be in a standard affirmative sentence:GRAMMATICALITY 5 possible and impossible in English, is too horrifying to be entertained for long. In most of the passages in which Chomsky discusses grammaticality, it is also true that he is ultimately concerned not with sentences in isolation, but with series of sentences to which given transforms may or may not be applied.This is an example of Negative Inversion.. According to Wikipedia:. In linguistics, negative inversion is one of many types of subject-auxiliary inversion in English. A negation (e.g. not, no, never, nothing, etc.) or a word that implies negation (only, hardly, scarcely) or a phrase containing one of these words precedes the finite auxiliary verb necessitating that the subject and finite ...Syntax in English is the arrangement of words and phrases in a specific order. If you change the position of even one word, it's possible to change the meaning of the entire sentence. All languages have specific rules about which words go where, and skilled writers can manipulate these rules to make sentences sound more poignant or poetic.Grammaticality definition, the state or quality of being grammatical. See more. 6.4 Identifying phrases: Constituency tests By identifying certain parts of sentences as phrases, we are making a claim that language users represent them as units in their mental grammar.The technical term for units inside a sentence is constituent: a constituent is any group of words that acts together within a sentence.. Along with headedness, constituency is one of the central concepts in ...It is the insertion of a word into another word. In "a whole nother" the "a" and the "-nother" go together and the "whole" is slotted between them. It is exactly the same process you get with the common, but more vulgar, "Abso-fucking-lutely" or "unbe-fucking-lievable". For a humorous take on the subject: xkcd.

It's not "correct" in standard English, but it is fairly common slang to say "more better" (or, quite often, "mo' better"). "Much, much better" and "far better" are "correct" formal alternatives, with "way better" being only slightly informal. Much better is already emphatic. Far better and way better seem equally emphatic to me, though the ...

But even though in principle the word more makes no difference to the grammaticality, informal (and/or uneducated) speakers/writers do in fact often use OP's version. One could say there's an implied/elided "What is more" before important (in practice people often would include either that or an equivalent construction).The simple agreement rule* is that the number of the verb should correspond to the number of the grammatical subject. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (p499) states the rule as follows:. In simple agreement, the verb agrees with a subject with the form of an NP (noun phrase) whose person-number classification derives from its head noun.1 Answer. The presence or absence of even certainly does change the meaning. Larceny occurs when... suggests that what follows is the definition of larceny. Larceny occurs even when... implies that the victim's lack of capacity might be expected to mean that the action was not larceny. It's not clear what you mean by 'in the beginning'.The past tense of put is put; the past tense of putt is putted. Since input is formed from "put" rather than "putt", it seems logical that its past tense should be input, rather than "inputted"; "inputted" sounds like a demented golfing term. Share. Improve this answer. Follow. edited May 21, 2014 at 16:50.31‏/08‏/2023 ... ... grammaticality; that is, the extent to which utterances follow the grammatical rules of a language. The participants in the study were 40 ...The notion of grammaticality rose alongside the theory of generative grammar, the goal of which is to formulate rules that define well-formed, grammatical, sentences. These rules …Sorted by: 65. The word uniform begins with a palatal approximant /j/. The palatal approximant is a consonantal sound, even though the letter itself is a vowel. Since we use the pronunciation of the word following the article to determine whether we use "a" or "an", and because it is pronounced starting with a consonant, we use "a".Sorted by: 65. The word uniform begins with a palatal approximant /j/. The palatal approximant is a consonantal sound, even though the letter itself is a vowel. Since we use the pronunciation of the word following the article to determine whether we use "a" or "an", and because it is pronounced starting with a consonant, we use "a".

Oasis certification online.

Whittlesey.

As you found in your research, this may be dialectal. In British English, the is required to turn following into an adjective, rather than having it parsed as a verb. In following [something] → the something is being followed In the following [something] → the something follows In following their officers’ orders, the Light Brigade charged into …May 9, 2013 at 5:25. 1. Ain't ... no is by no means confined to BVE (now usually 'AAVE', African-American); it is employed to the best of my knowledge in every colloquial American dialect, and probably every American idiolect unconstrained by formality. "Ain't no use in callin' out my name, gal" -Bob Dylan, 1962.3. in general "fall off" implies a sense of movement or detachment from something while "fall from" is related to the location (physical or not - eg: grace). - msam. Feb 27, 2014 at 7:35. 4. @msam I agree. To fall off something implies you were on it. The relationship is one of juxtaposition, ie a continuum metaphor.1. "More big" is not more polite; it is less correct. ("Most nice" is possible, but sounds odd; using "most" in this way is generally reserved for deliberately archaic politenesses, like "Why thank you, you are most kind.") - Nathan Tuggy. May 22, 2015 at 0:48. 1. "more big" is not "less correct" - it is simply wrong.If on the other hand you are speaking about your current state or intentions, you should use the perfect form: In the last two weeks I haven't had much time, so I haven't got that quotation for you. In the last two weeks I haven't had much time, but I expect to be able to address your question soon. In colloquial use, however, particularly when ...Personality, prescriptivism, and pronouns: Factors influencing grammaticality judgments of gender-neutral language – CORRIGENDUM Evan D. Bradley , Maxwell Schmid and Hannah Lombardo English Today , Volume 35 , Issue 4grammaticality; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Jun 25, 2015 at 16:59. Paul Rowe. 4,200 11 11 silver badges 19 19 bronze badges. asked Jun 25, 2015 at 8:09. Soudabeh Soudabeh. 9,207 22 22 gold badges 67 67 silver badges 99 99 bronze badges. 7. 1. My first observation is that they are not saying the same thing. In the first example ...True, 'updation' made its way to wikitionary, but it's some local Indian phenomenon and it does not occur in other places. Europe we still use noun of "update" or "updating" depending on context. "updation" sounds absolutely strange.The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. A comprehensive review of the acceptability judgment literature prior to 1996, with topics ranging from the evidential role of acceptability in theories of grammar, to concerns about the reliability of traditionally collected ... ….

grammaticality in British English. (ɡrəmætɪˈkælɪtɪ ) 名词. (of a sentence) the state or quality of being well formed; correctness. examples where the grammaticality of a sentence was connected to the beliefs of the speaker. Collins English Dictionary.You can (almost always) figure out which pronoun to use by removing the rest of the people from the list. This includes me. Obviously, if there is another part of the sentence, don't forget that the pronoun can be affected. "Myself" is reflexive, and so normally requires "I" to be the subject of the sentence. I sent myself postcards from Spain.5 jun 2012 ... 12 - Grammaticality judgment tasks. Published online by Cambridge ... Grammaticality or acceptability judgment tasks (henceforth GJT) are ...In linguistics, grammaticality is determined by the conformity to language usage as derived by the grammar of a particular speech variety. The notion of grammaticality rose alongside the theory of generative grammar, the goal of which is to formulate rules that define well-formed, grammatical, sentences. These rules of grammaticality also provide …grammaticality; word-order; phrasal-verbs; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Apr 19, 2012 at 9:09. RegDwigнt. 96.9k 39 39 gold badges 308 308 silver badges 400 400 bronze badges. asked Apr 19, 2012 at 9:07. Pietro Pietro. 1,387 16 16 gold badges 36 36 silver badges 51 51 bronze badges.grammaticality; questions; conversation; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Aug 2, 2012 at 13:44. MetaEd. 28.3k 17 17 gold badges 85 85 silver badges 138 138 bronze badges. asked Aug 2, 2012 at 9:23. Vinayak Kolagi Vinayak Kolagi. 151 1 1 gold badge 1 1 silver badge 5 5 bronze badges. 2.Grammaticality definition: (of a sentence) the state or quality of being well formed; correctness | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examplesgrammaticality; verbs; prepositions; parallelism; Share. Improve this question. Follow edited Dec 10, 2013 at 20:52. RegDwigнt. 96.9k 39 39 gold badges 307 307 silver badges 400 400 bronze badges. asked Aug 16, 2010 at 11:14. b.roth b.roth.Normally, you are free to either omit or repeat to in an elliptical, parallel construction like this. However, in this case the word first stands between to and the infinitive, and so you cannot repeat to while omitting first in the second branch. Repeating both to and first, however, sounds a little awkward, perhaps because it is a bit redundant.It is possible, but I recommend leaving out to ... Grammaticality, [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1], [text-1-1]